16 Comments
User's avatar
Donald Robotham's avatar

Particularly appreciate your documenting the fact that many 19thC Lagosians understood the significance of the tech challenge and made efforts to address it, then as now. But the society as a whole failed. Politics!

philip's avatar

Mr Feyi, I always look forward to your writings. I must say today's piece didn't disappoint.

Feyi Fawehinmi's avatar

Thank you for reading!

Olowo Aminu's avatar

Another amazing piece. How the Japanese took to modernizing around the Meiji era is super fascinating to me because the two and a half centuries of the Edo period don’t necessarily seem like they set the right background in place. Perhaps it was pent up frustration from the samurai class.

Tanitoluwa's avatar

I am glad to have been baited tonight. this was really good.

NNAMDI's avatar

A fine article. This shows stark cultural differences between Japan and Nigeria.

I think we don't have that knack in us yet because there are more societal issues to be resolved before innovation can take precedence.

Eniola's avatar

This is deeply insightful. Thank you for sharing!

Laide Adekanle's avatar

Thank you for this. I must say, as it was then and now, same policy, different outcomes.

Feyi Fawehinmi's avatar

Thanks for reading!

'wole Olabanji's avatar

Thank you for this thought-provoking piece.

Indeed, it does appear that our culture experiences technology mostly as a consumer.

One thing that I am curious about (I may have discussed this with you at some point) is why the technical know-how (poured metal casting) that produced something like the Benin bronzes did not transition (at least not at scale) into tool making, for instance. That know-how/technology survives to date, and is used in making fairly sophisticated machinery elsewhere, but has suffered a terrible strain of arrested development in our context.

Any thoughts on why this is the case?

Donald Robotham's avatar

An important question. One answer (also faced by the failure of the considerable efforts of the Ottomans to modernize) had to do with how these craft skills were organized: usually in hereditary lineage-guilds which established considerable barriers to entry and innovation (taboos/ritual-supernatural injunctions etc). Also they tended to be attached to royal courts rather than producing for a large competitive market which would have generated powerful pressures to innovate and modernize. The role of state also decisive: the Meiji Japanese state faced by the prospect of Western colonization, ruthlessly suppressed their traditionalist Shoguns and aggressively modernized their craft sectors in the second half of the 19th century. So it was doable under certain conditions. Deeper study of pre-colonial African economic history badly needed.

Donald Robotham's avatar

Sorry to imposs further but I have to raise the issue of slave trading or rather slave raiding which was the ever present context even when Benin was not a participant. Craft innovation or any other form of modernization was completely out of the question in such a highly militarized setting. We don't realize the immense historical price paid during the long and turbulent slave raiding era. Extremely destructive and set us back centuries in the very period when others were modernizing. Now we have to play catchup and of course it's hard. But we MUST do it. I am from Jamaica btw. Best wishes to you!

Carl-Henri Prophète's avatar

"Curiosity without a learning system becomes consumption". The piece got me thinking about the less successful example of Ali Pasha in Egypt some years before these 2 exemples. Fascinating!

Donald Robotham's avatar

Yes, key comparative case. The British killed that effort!

Donald Robotham's avatar

I stole 'self-strengthenng' from the term used to describe the failed Qing dynasty efforts to modernize China at the end of 19thC. Again feudal politics was their obstacle

Donald Robotham's avatar

Invaluable! The lessons are clear.